Global ransomware attacks, like WannaCry and NotPetya, showed just how vulnerable companies are, especially when it comes to their data. WannaCry alone infected hundreds of thousands of machines around the world. Numerous large organizations were crippled by ransomware last summer:
George Bernard Shaw, through his plays, was one of my early heroes. I knew only the good of him then. More recently I have come to learn things, about his political views, that I could have known then but did not, and knowing, would have seen him differently.
Learning them prompts me to want to know more about his contradictory character, to decide anew what we should think of him. That kindly old gentleman pulling the strings attached to Henry Higgins and Eliza Doolittle on the cover of the vinyl album of My Fair Lady died in at the Methuselan age of ninety-four.
An early leader of the originally tiny Fabian Society, he was a lifelong socialist, but that narrow catechism could not contain his ebullient eclecticism. Shaw was not a Marxist but a Nietzschean, not an atheist but a believer in Bergsonian vitalism.
The reasoning is usually along the lines of those marvelous syllogisms so beloved by the Glenn Becks of the world: It is where it is where the idea of eugenics, breed the perfect race, breed a better voter.
These are all stated. It runs from guilt by association to guilt without any association. Glenn Beck may not be the best example, as he is in somewhat bad odor even among conservatives as himself a lunatic. Weintraub is a distinguished Shaw scholar, and editor of Bernard Shaw: He claimed that he was a National Socialist before Hitler was.
The only exception I am able to think of is Bernard Shaw, who, for some years at any rate, declared Communism and Fascism to be much the same thing, and was in favour of both of them.
What is dishonest about all this stuff is not the quotes from leftists but the claim that eugenics was widely supported by leftists and the omission of all those on the right who were eager, and very well-funded, champions of eugenics — for some, poison gas and all. The problem with the right-wing use of Shaw to pillory moderate socialists and nonsocialist liberal progressives is not only that very few of the latter held such views, but that this kind of cherry picking is ahistorical.
The very idea that there is such a thing as social change dates mainly from the Industrial Revolution, when it became obvious in daily life.
Much of philosophy, social theorizing, and political organizing since has aimed to figure out to what degree we can have effective input into our own future, to guide the unfolding changes rather than simply submit to them. Many paths forward have been embraced only to prove disastrous later.
Communism and fascism are the textbook examples. Darwin showed that there was biological change as well as political and economic change. Eugenics was an attempt to take charge of human evolution, which was ultimately found to be far more difficult and to involve a far greater potential for evil than its first advocates imagined.
It expanded in the United States to bar marriage or reproduction by those deemed mentally unfit, a category that began with the retarded and the mentally ill, and which expanded to swallow up many poor black women. These atrocious policies were widely enacted into American law through the lobbying of major foundations, which were generally more conservative than liberal.
Eugenics was supported by some leftists and liberals, such as H. The main difference is that the Irish and Britons mainly talked about eugenics while the American corporate foundations poured large amounts of money into its implementation.
This was promoted by wealthy organizations such as the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie foundations. A similar treatment could be advantageously applied to the insane, guilty of criminal acts.Executive Summary. Reprint: RB. The old ways of setting and implementing strategy are failing us, writes the author of Leading Change, in part because we can no longer keep up with the pace of.
Can an organization survive without a strategy? Why? Provide evidence to support your claim. To best address the above question, an understanding of strategy and strategic management must first be .
Oct 02, · Everyone is responsible for strategy, but responsibility for execution rests at the top. I can't list everything the new book reveals here, there is simply not enough room, but I suspect you already realize the times we're living in and that action is called for you could spend the rest of your life researching things on the internet without stumbling across this stuff.
TIGER HABITAT PROTECTION: THE SOLUTIONS. Most conservationists agree that strong protection of wildlife reserves has been the key to the endangered tiger’s survival so far.
Nov 26, · The panel began with the findings of the site visits by the SD Learning Consortium (SDLC) in to some large organizations that are implementing Agile and operating entrepreneurially at .